1966 Mercury Comet vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer

To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 4,738 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer (276 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1966 Mercury Comet. (198 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 1966 Mercury Comet.

Because 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Mercury Comet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Mercury Comet. (382 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Mercury Comet.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Mercury Comet 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer
Make Mercury Mitsubishi
Model Comet Lancer
Year Released 1966 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4738 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 198 HP 276 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 382 Nm 388 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 3500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 5000 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2510 mm