1966 Mercury Comet vs. 2006 Volkswagen Citi
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Citi is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 3,279 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Comet (118 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 2006 Volkswagen Citi. (72 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 2006 Volkswagen Citi.
Because 1966 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Citi, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Mercury Comet (258 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 150 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volkswagen Citi. (108 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1966 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volkswagen Citi.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Mercury Comet | 2006 Volkswagen Citi | |
Make | Mercury | Volkswagen |
Model | Comet | Citi |
Year Released | 1966 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3279 cc | 1423 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2410 mm |