1966 Mercury Comet vs. 2008 Opel Meriva
To start off, 2008 Opel Meriva is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 6,393 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Comet weights approximately 455 kg more than 2008 Opel Meriva.
Because 1966 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Opel Meriva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Mercury Comet (546 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 380 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Opel Meriva. (166 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 1966 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Opel Meriva.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Mercury Comet | 2008 Opel Meriva | |
Make | Mercury | Opel |
Model | Comet | Meriva |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6393 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 267 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 546 Nm | 166 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 103 mm | 80.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 88.2 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2640 mm |