1966 Mercury Comet vs. 2008 Renault Symbol
To start off, 2008 Renault Symbol is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 3,279 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Comet (118 HP) has 44 more horse power than 2008 Renault Symbol. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 2008 Renault Symbol.
Because 1966 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Renault Symbol, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Mercury Comet (258 Nm) has 153 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Renault Symbol. (105 Nm). This means 1966 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Renault Symbol.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Mercury Comet | 2008 Renault Symbol | |
Make | Mercury | Renault |
Model | Comet | Symbol |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3279 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 258 Nm | 105 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4261 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1639 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1439 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2473 mm |