1966 Mercury Comet vs. 2008 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2008 Saturn Outlook is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 4,738 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Saturn Outlook (276 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1966 Mercury Comet. (198 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Saturn Outlook should accelerate faster than 1966 Mercury Comet.
Because 2008 Saturn Outlook is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Mercury Comet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Saturn Outlook will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Mercury Comet (382 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Saturn Outlook. (340 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1966 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Saturn Outlook.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Mercury Comet | 2008 Saturn Outlook | |
Make | Mercury | Saturn |
Model | Comet | Outlook |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4738 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 276 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 382 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3030 mm |