1966 Mercury Comet vs. 2009 Renault Koleos
To start off, 2009 Renault Koleos is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 6,393 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Comet (267 HP) has 98 more horse power than 2009 Renault Koleos. (169 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Koleos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Comet weights approximately 125 kg more than 2009 Renault Koleos. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Renault Koleos is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Mercury Comet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Koleos will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Mercury Comet | 2009 Renault Koleos | |
| Make | Mercury | Renault |
| Model | Comet | Koleos |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6393 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 169 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1775 kg | 1650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4520 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1855 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1695 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2690 mm |
