1966 Mercury Comet vs. 2010 Renault Fluence
To start off, 2010 Renault Fluence is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 6,393 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Comet (267 HP) has 157 more horse power than 2010 Renault Fluence. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 2010 Renault Fluence. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Comet weights approximately 135 kg more than 2010 Renault Fluence. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Fluence, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Mercury Comet | 2010 Renault Fluence | |
| Make | Mercury | Renault |
| Model | Comet | Fluence |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6393 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 267 HP | 110 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1225 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4618 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1809 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1478 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2702 mm |
