1966 Mercury Comet vs. 2012 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2012 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 4,738 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Jeep Wrangler (285 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1966 Mercury Comet. (198 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1966 Mercury Comet.
Because 2012 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Mercury Comet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Mercury Comet (382 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Jeep Wrangler. (352 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1966 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Mercury Comet | 2012 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Mercury | Jeep |
Model | Comet | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4738 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 198 HP | 285 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 382 Nm | 352 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4404 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2946 mm |