1966 Mercury Comet vs. 2013 Mini Coupe

To start off, 2013 Mini Coupe is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 3,279 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mini Coupe (181 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1966 Mercury Comet. (118 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mini Coupe should accelerate faster than 1966 Mercury Comet.

Because 1966 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Coupe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Mercury Comet (258 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Coupe. (240 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1966 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Coupe.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Mercury Comet 2013 Mini Coupe
Make Mercury Mini
Model Comet Coupe
Year Released 1966 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3279 cc 1600 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 118 HP 181 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 258 Nm 240 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 5000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 103.1 mm 77 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Length 5180 mm 3734 mm
Vehicle Width 1880 mm 1892 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1384 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2467 mm