1966 Mercury Cougar vs. 1962 Volvo 220
To start off, 1966 Mercury Cougar is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 4,728 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cougar (129 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 347 kg more than 1962 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Mercury Cougar | 1962 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Mercury | Volvo |
| Model | Cougar | 220 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4728 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1362 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2610 mm |
