1966 Mercury Cougar vs. 1964 Morris Mini Moke
To start off, 1966 Mercury Cougar is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Morris Mini Moke. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Morris Mini Moke would be higher. At 6,392 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cougar (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1964 Morris Mini Moke. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1964 Morris Mini Moke. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 1010 kg more than 1964 Morris Mini Moke. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Morris Mini Moke, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Mercury Cougar | 1964 Morris Mini Moke | |
Make | Mercury | Morris |
Model | Cougar | Mini Moke |
Year Released | 1966 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6392 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 208 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 3050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1310 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2040 mm |