1966 Mercury Cougar vs. 1977 Renault 4
To start off, 1977 Renault 4 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,728 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cougar (129 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1977 Renault 4. (34 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1977 Renault 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 702 kg more than 1977 Renault 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Mercury Cougar | 1977 Renault 4 | |
Make | Mercury | Renault |
Model | Cougar | 4 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4728 cc | 845 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1362 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2410 mm |