1966 Mercury Cougar vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 1982 Renault 9 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,728 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cougar (129 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 512 kg more than 1982 Renault 9. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Renault 9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Mercury Cougar | 1982 Renault 9 | |
Make | Mercury | Renault |
Model | Cougar | 9 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4728 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1362 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2490 mm |