1966 Mercury Cougar vs. 1999 Acura CL
To start off, 1999 Acura CL is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,728 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Acura CL (150 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1966 Mercury Cougar. (129 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1966 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Acura CL weights approximately 218 kg more than 1966 Mercury Cougar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Acura CL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Mercury Cougar | 1999 Acura CL | |
| Make | Mercury | Acura |
| Model | Cougar | CL |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4728 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 150 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1362 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4826 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1781 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1389 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2715 mm |
