1966 Mercury Cougar vs. 2000 Peugeot 106
To start off, 2000 Peugeot 106 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,728 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cougar (129 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 2000 Peugeot 106. (59 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 2000 Peugeot 106. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 576 kg more than 2000 Peugeot 106. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Peugeot 106, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Mercury Cougar | 2000 Peugeot 106 | |
Make | Mercury | Peugeot |
Model | Cougar | 106 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4728 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1362 kg | 786 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 3570 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2390 mm |