1966 Mercury Cougar vs. 2001 Chevrolet Prizm

To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Prizm is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,728 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cougar (129 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2001 Chevrolet Prizm. (124 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 2001 Chevrolet Prizm. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 272 kg more than 2001 Chevrolet Prizm. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Prizm, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Mercury Cougar 2001 Chevrolet Prizm
Make Mercury Chevrolet
Model Cougar Prizm
Year Released 1966 2001
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4728 cc 1794 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 129 HP 124 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1362 kg 1090 kg
Vehicle Length 4990 mm 4430 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2830 mm 2470 mm