1966 Mercury Cougar vs. 2001 Lancia Zeta

To start off, 2001 Lancia Zeta is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,728 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Lancia Zeta (134 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1966 Mercury Cougar. (129 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1966 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Lancia Zeta weights approximately 238 kg more than 1966 Mercury Cougar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Mercury Cougar 2001 Lancia Zeta
Make Mercury Lancia
Model Cougar Zeta
Year Released 1966 2001
Body Type Coupe Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4728 cc 1995 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 129 HP 134 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 6000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1362 kg 1600 kg
Vehicle Length 4990 mm 4480 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1840 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1720 mm
Wheelbase Size 2830 mm 2830 mm