1966 Mercury Cougar vs. 2002 Saleen S7
To start off, 2002 Saleen S7 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 7,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Saleen S7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Saleen S7 (550 HP) has 342 more horse power than 1966 Mercury Cougar. (208 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Saleen S7 should accelerate faster than 1966 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 413 kg more than 2002 Saleen S7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Mercury Cougar | 2002 Saleen S7 | |
| Make | Mercury | Saleen |
| Model | Cougar | S7 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6392 cc | 7000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 208 HP | 550 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1660 kg | 1247 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4755 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1981 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1041 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2692 mm |
