1966 Mercury Cougar vs. 2003 Volvo V50

To start off, 2003 Volvo V50 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 6,392 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cougar (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2003 Volvo V50. (161 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 2003 Volvo V50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 261 kg more than 2003 Volvo V50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1966 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo V50, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Mercury Cougar 2003 Volvo V50
Make Mercury Volvo
Model Cougar V50
Year Released 1966 2003
Body Type Coupe Station Wagon
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6392 cc 2435 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 208 HP 161 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 6000 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1660 kg 1399 kg
Vehicle Length 4990 mm 4520 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1780 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2830 mm 2630 mm