1966 Mercury Cougar vs. 2007 Renault Kangoo
To start off, 2007 Renault Kangoo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,728 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cougar (129 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2007 Renault Kangoo. (94 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cougar should accelerate faster than 2007 Renault Kangoo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Renault Kangoo weights approximately 13 kg more than 1966 Mercury Cougar.
Because 2007 Renault Kangoo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Renault Kangoo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Mercury Cougar | 2007 Renault Kangoo | |
Make | Mercury | Renault |
Model | Cougar | Kangoo |
Year Released | 1966 | 2007 |
Body Type | Coupe | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4728 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 94 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1362 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2630 mm |