1966 Mercury Cougar vs. 2008 Opel Omega
To start off, 2008 Opel Omega is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,728 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Mercury Cougar weights approximately 33 kg more than 2008 Opel Omega.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Mercury Cougar | 2008 Opel Omega | |
Make | Mercury | Opel |
Model | Cougar | Omega |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4728 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1362 kg | 1329 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 3540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2740 mm |