1966 Mercury Cougar vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,728 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 163 kg more than 1966 Mercury Cougar.
Because 1966 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Mercury Cougar | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Mercury | Rover |
Model | Cougar | 75 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4728 cc | 2497 cc |
Horse Power | 129 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1362 kg | 1525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2750 mm |