1966 MG 1100 vs. 1980 Seat 131
To start off, 1980 Seat 131 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,297 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Seat 131 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 53 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Seat 131 weights approximately 140 kg more than 1966 MG 1100.
Because 1980 Seat 131 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Seat 131. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Seat 131 (94 Nm @ 2700 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1980 Seat 131 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1966 MG 1100 | 1980 Seat 131 | |
Make | MG | Seat |
Model | 1100 | 131 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1096 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 83 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 965 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2500 mm |