1966 MG 1100 vs. 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste
To start off, 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste weights approximately 120 kg more than 1966 MG 1100.
Because 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 MG 1100 | 1982 Mitsubishi Celeste | |
| Make | MG | Mitsubishi |
| Model | 1100 | Celeste |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1096 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 945 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2350 mm |
