1966 MG 1100 vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 MG 1100 would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (167 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1966 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1966 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 3 weights approximately 558 kg more than 1966 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1966 MG 1100 | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | MG | Mazda |
Model | 1100 | 3 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1096 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 167 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 228 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1383 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4506 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2639 mm |