1966 MG MGC vs. 1951 Singer SM 1500
To start off, 1966 MG MGC is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Singer SM 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Singer SM 1500 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 MG MGC (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1951 Singer SM 1500. (47 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 MG MGC should accelerate faster than 1951 Singer SM 1500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 MG MGC (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Singer SM 1500. (98 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1966 MG MGC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Singer SM 1500.
Compare all specifications:
1966 MG MGC | 1951 Singer SM 1500 | |
Make | MG | Singer |
Model | MGC | SM 1500 |
Year Released | 1966 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 98 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2320 mm |