1966 MG MGC vs. 2003 Opel Meriva
To start off, 2003 Opel Meriva is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 MG MGC (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2003 Opel Meriva. (101 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 MG MGC should accelerate faster than 2003 Opel Meriva.
Because 1966 MG MGC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 MG MGC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Opel Meriva, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 MG MGC (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Opel Meriva. (150 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1966 MG MGC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Opel Meriva.
Compare all specifications:
1966 MG MGC | 2003 Opel Meriva | |
Make | MG | Opel |
Model | MGC | Meriva |
Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2740 mm |