1966 MG MGC vs. 2009 Peugeot 607
To start off, 2009 Peugeot 607 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 MG MGC (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 2009 Peugeot 607. (134 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 MG MGC should accelerate faster than 2009 Peugeot 607.
Because 1966 MG MGC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 MG MGC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Peugeot 607, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Peugeot 607 (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 MG MGC. (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Peugeot 607 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 MG MGC.
Compare all specifications:
1966 MG MGC | 2009 Peugeot 607 | |
Make | MG | Peugeot |
Model | MGC | 607 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2810 mm |