1966 MG MGC vs. 2011 Nissan Juke
To start off, 2011 Nissan Juke is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Juke (188 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1966 MG MGC. (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Juke should accelerate faster than 1966 MG MGC.
Because 2011 Nissan Juke is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 MG MGC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Juke will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Juke (240 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 MG MGC. (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2011 Nissan Juke will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 MG MGC.
Compare all specifications:
1966 MG MGC | 2011 Nissan Juke | |
Make | MG | Nissan |
Model | MGC | Juke |
Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 188 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4125 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2530 mm |