1966 MG MGC vs. 2013 Mazda 2
To start off, 2013 Mazda 2 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 MG MGC (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2013 Mazda 2. (100 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 MG MGC should accelerate faster than 2013 Mazda 2.
Because 1966 MG MGC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 MG MGC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 MG MGC (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mazda 2. (133 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1966 MG MGC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 MG MGC | 2013 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | MG | Mazda |
| Model | MGC | 2 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 1498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1476 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2489 mm |
