1966 MG MGC vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz M
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz M is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 MG MGC would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz M (237 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1966 MG MGC. (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz M should accelerate faster than 1966 MG MGC.
Because 2013 Mercedes-Benz M is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 MG MGC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz M will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz M (617 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 443 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 MG MGC. (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 MG MGC.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 MG MGC | 2013 Mercedes-Benz M | |
| Make | MG | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | MGC | M |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2912 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 237 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 617 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4804 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1796 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2915 mm |
