1966 Mini MK I vs. 1990 Renault Clio
To start off, 1990 Renault Clio is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Renault Clio (79 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1966 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1966 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Renault Clio weights approximately 225 kg more than 1966 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Renault Clio (107 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Mini MK I. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1990 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Mini MK I | 1990 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mini | Renault |
Model | MK I | Clio |
Year Released | 1966 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 61 Nm | 107 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 615 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1400 mm |