1966 Mini MK I vs. 1994 Rover 800
To start off, 1994 Rover 800 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mini MK I would be higher. At 2,675 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Rover 800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Rover 800 (167 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1966 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Rover 800 should accelerate faster than 1966 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover 800 weights approximately 909 kg more than 1966 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Rover 800 (225 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Mini MK I. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1994 Rover 800 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Mini MK I | 1994 Rover 800 | |
| Make | Mini | Rover |
| Model | MK I | 800 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 2675 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 167 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5900 RPM |
| Torque | 61 Nm | 225 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 615 kg | 1524 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4890 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2750 mm |
