1966 Mini MK I vs. 2004 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2004 Toyota Camry is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mini MK I would be higher. At 3,310 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Camry (225 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1966 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1966 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Camry weights approximately 999 kg more than 1966 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Camry (325 Nm) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Mini MK I. (61 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Mini MK I | 2004 Toyota Camry | |
| Make | Mini | Toyota |
| Model | MK I | Camry |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 3310 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Torque | 61 Nm | 325 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 615 kg | 1614 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2800 mm |
