1966 Mini MK I vs. 2005 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2005 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (143 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1966 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1966 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 670 kg more than 1966 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan X-Trail (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Mini MK I. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2005 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Mini MK I | 2005 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Mini | Nissan |
| Model | MK I | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 61 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 615 kg | 1285 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2540 mm |
