1966 Mini MK I vs. 2005 Zastava 103
To start off, 2005 Zastava 103 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,242 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Zastava 103 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Zastava 103 (59 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1966 Mini MK I. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Zastava 103 should accelerate faster than 1966 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Zastava 103 weights approximately 305 kg more than 1966 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Zastava 103 (88 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Mini MK I. (61 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2005 Zastava 103 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Mini MK I | 2005 Zastava 103 | |
| Make | Mini | Zastava |
| Model | MK I | 103 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 1242 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 61 Nm | 88 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 615 kg | 920 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2510 mm |
