1966 Mitsubishi 500 vs. 2002 Mitsubishi eK
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi eK is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mitsubishi 500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mitsubishi 500 would be higher. At 657 cc (3 cylinders), 2002 Mitsubishi eK is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mitsubishi eK weights approximately 260 kg more than 1966 Mitsubishi 500.
Because 1966 Mitsubishi 500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mitsubishi 500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi eK, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Mitsubishi 500 | 2002 Mitsubishi eK | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Mitsubishi |
Model | 500 | eK |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 594 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 23 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 530 kg | 790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3170 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2070 mm | 2350 mm |