1966 Morris 1800 vs. 1967 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1967 Riley Kestrel is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Morris 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Morris 1800 would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Morris 1800 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Morris 1800 (79 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (57 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Morris 1800 should accelerate faster than 1967 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Morris 1800 weights approximately 285 kg more than 1967 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Morris 1800 (137 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Riley Kestrel. (94 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Morris 1800 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Morris 1800 | 1967 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Morris | Riley |
Model | 1800 | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1966 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 1799 cc | 1275 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2380 mm |