1966 Morris 1800 vs. 2005 Suzuki Reno
To start off, 2005 Suzuki Reno is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Morris 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Morris 1800 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Suzuki Reno (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1966 Morris 1800. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 1966 Morris 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Suzuki Reno weights approximately 62 kg more than 1966 Morris 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Suzuki Reno (178 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Morris 1800. (137 Nm). This means 2005 Suzuki Reno will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Morris 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Morris 1800 | 2005 Suzuki Reno | |
Make | Morris | Suzuki |
Model | 1800 | Reno |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1799 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 178 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80.3 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88.9 mm | 86 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1262 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |