1966 Morris 1800 vs. 2012 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2012 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Morris 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Morris 1800 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1966 Morris 1800. (79 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1966 Morris 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda CX-7 weights approximately 518 kg more than 1966 Morris 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda CX-7 (349 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Morris 1800. (137 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2012 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Morris 1800.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Morris 1800 | 2012 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Morris | Mazda |
Model | 1800 | CX-7 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1799 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 79 HP | 244 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 349 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2100 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1200 kg | 1718 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4681 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1646 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2751 mm |