1966 Morris Mini Moke vs. 2009 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Morris Mini Moke. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Morris Mini Moke would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (149 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1966 Morris Mini Moke. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1966 Morris Mini Moke.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (220 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Morris Mini Moke. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2009 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Morris Mini Moke.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Morris Mini Moke | 2009 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Morris | Volkswagen |
| Model | Mini Moke | Polo |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 1781 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 149 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 60 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 1950 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3050 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1310 mm | 1470 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2470 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 45 L |
