1966 Morris Minor vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Morris Minor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Morris Minor would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Renault Clio weights approximately 135 kg more than 1966 Morris Minor.
Because 1966 Morris Minor is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Morris Minor. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Morris Minor | 1998 Renault Clio | |
Make | Morris | Renault |
Model | Minor | Clio |
Year Released | 1966 | 1998 |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 935 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 50 L |