1966 Morris Minor vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Morris Minor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Morris Minor would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 223 more horse power than 1966 Morris Minor. (47 HP @ 5100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1966 Morris Minor. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1210 kg more than 1966 Morris Minor. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (434 Nm) has 353 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Morris Minor. (81 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Morris Minor.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Morris Minor | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Morris | Toyota |
Model | Minor | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 434 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.5:1 | 9.6:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 800 kg | 2010 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2190 mm | 2800 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 87 L |