1966 Morris Traveller vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Morris Traveller. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Morris Traveller would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Morris Traveller weights approximately 10 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Morris Traveller, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Smart Fortwo (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Morris Traveller. (81 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Smart Fortwo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Morris Traveller.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Morris Traveller | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Morris | Smart |
Model | Traveller | Fortwo |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5100 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 81 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 64.6 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.7 mm | 81 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 830 kg | 820 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 1867 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 33 L |