1966 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2007 Holden Epica
To start off, 2007 Holden Epica is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2007 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 101 more horse power than 1966 Nissan Bluebird. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1966 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1966 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2007 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 231 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Bluebird. (89 Nm). This means 2007 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Nissan Bluebird | 2007 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Nissan | Holden |
| Model | Bluebird | Epica |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1189 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 89 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2700 mm |
