1966 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2007 Holden UTE
To start off, 2007 Holden UTE is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 195 more horse power than 1966 Nissan Bluebird. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1966 Nissan Bluebird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Bluebird. (89 Nm). This means 2007 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Nissan Bluebird | 2007 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Nissan | Holden |
| Model | Bluebird | UTE |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1189 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 242 HP |
| Torque | 89 Nm | 330 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
