1966 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2012 Peugeot 408
To start off, 2012 Peugeot 408 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Peugeot 408 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot 408 (143 HP) has 96 more horse power than 1966 Nissan Bluebird. (47 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 408 should accelerate faster than 1966 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 1966 Nissan Bluebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Nissan Bluebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 408, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Peugeot 408 (240 Nm) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Nissan Bluebird. (89 Nm). This means 2012 Peugeot 408 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Nissan Bluebird | 2012 Peugeot 408 | |
Make | Nissan | Peugeot |
Model | Bluebird | 408 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1189 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 143 HP |
Torque | 89 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1815 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1525 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2710 mm |