1966 Nissan Cedric vs. 1974 Austin Marina
To start off, 1974 Austin Marina is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1974 Austin Marina. (59 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1974 Austin Marina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 410 kg more than 1974 Austin Marina. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Austin Marina. (102 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1966 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Austin Marina.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Nissan Cedric | 1974 Austin Marina | |
| Make | Nissan | Austin |
| Model | Cedric | Marina |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1798 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2440 mm |
