1966 Nissan Cedric vs. 1980 Suzuki Alto
To start off, 1980 Suzuki Alto is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1980 Suzuki Alto. (38 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1980 Suzuki Alto. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 680 kg more than 1980 Suzuki Alto. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Suzuki Alto. (60 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1966 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Suzuki Alto.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Nissan Cedric | 1980 Suzuki Alto | |
| Make | Nissan | Suzuki |
| Model | Cedric | Alto |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 165 Nm | 60 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1420 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2160 mm |
