1966 Nissan Cedric vs. 1982 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1982 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1966 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Nissan Cedric (114 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1966 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 425 kg more than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Nissan Cedric (165 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Pulsar. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1966 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Nissan Cedric | 1982 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Nissan | Nissan |
Model | Cedric | Pulsar |
Year Released | 1966 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 70 HP |
Torque | 165 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2420 mm |